<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2006</copyright><managingEditor>palrich@gmail.com</managingEditor><webMaster>palrich@gmail.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:02:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 15:02:14 +0000</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><generator>WeirdLooking.com</generator><link>http://www.weirdlooking.com/</link><description>WeirdLooking.com: Michael Barton's Blog</description><title>WeirdLooking.com: Michael Barton's Blog</title><item><title>which portable avatar is right for me?</title><dc:creator>Michael Barton</dc:creator><link>http://www.weirdlooking.com/blog/which-portable-avatar-is-right-for-me</link><guid>http://www.weirdlooking.com/blog/which-portable-avatar-is-right-for-me</guid><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 09:08:46 +0000</pubDate><description>I like the idea of avatars that travel with you, but which of these is the &amp;ldquo;right thing&amp;rdquo;?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravatar&quot; style=&quot;position: relative; padding-left: 8px; zoom: 1;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;position: absolute; top: -5px; left: 0px; width: 16px; height: 16px; background: URL(http://www.weirdlooking.com/exticon?http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FGravatar) no-repeat center center; -moz-opacity: 0.3; opacity: 0.3; filter:alpha(opacity=30);&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Gravatars&lt;/a&gt; are really popular and easy to implement, but it seems like the centralized nature would make it failure-prone and a privacy debacle waiting to happen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Favatar&quot; style=&quot;position: relative; padding-left: 8px; zoom: 1;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;position: absolute; top: -5px; left: 0px; width: 16px; height: 16px; background: URL(http://www.weirdlooking.com/exticon?http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FFavatar) no-repeat center center; -moz-opacity: 0.3; opacity: 0.3; filter:alpha(opacity=30);&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Favatars&lt;/a&gt; are a cool idea.&amp;nbsp; On the plus side, they&amp;rsquo;d start working right away.&amp;nbsp; On the other hand, I&amp;rsquo;m not sure how many people have their own favicons, and the implementation would be a bit &amp;ldquo;fun&amp;rdquo;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pavatar&quot; style=&quot;position: relative; padding-left: 8px; zoom: 1;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;position: absolute; top: -5px; left: 0px; width: 16px; height: 16px; background: URL(http://www.weirdlooking.com/exticon?http%3A%2F%2Fen.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FPavatar) no-repeat center center; -moz-opacity: 0.3; opacity: 0.3; filter:alpha(opacity=30);&quot;&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Pavatars&lt;/a&gt; have all the same problems as Favatars, they can just be bigger than 16x16px and aren&amp;rsquo;t tied to the favicon displayed by browsers.</description><category>website</category><category>avatars</category><comments>http://www.weirdlooking.com/blog/which-portable-avatar-is-right-for-me#comments</comments><wfw:comment>http://www.weirdlooking.com/comments/74</wfw:comment><wfw:commentRss>http://www.weirdlooking.com/rss/comments/74</wfw:commentRss><slash:comments>29</slash:comments></item></channel></rss>